Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayan Bera

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 21:24, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sayan Bera[edit]

Sayan Bera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, PROD rationale was: "BLP with not a single reliable source, cited sources are message boards, self-published, and/or don't mention this person." Lack of significant coverage in reliable independent sources means notability is not demonstrated. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) NorthAmerica1000 18:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly not enough significant coverage in reliable independent sources to meet WP:BIO or any other notability guideline. Google turns up mainly social media sites and fora. Jinkinson talk to me 18:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources and there is no indication of importance, even it appears to be self-promotion. — CutestPenguinHangout 06:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not significant to have a wikipedia article. Run-of-the-millWP:MILL Athachil (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.