Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save Ardmore Coalition
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ardmore, Pennsylvania#Eminent domain controversy. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 04:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Save Ardmore Coalition[edit]
- Save Ardmore Coalition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notable coverage beyond one or two passing mentions in news articles. Some of the information of the group's site might possibly be relevant to Kelo v. City of New London. -- LWG talk 17:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition to local press, this organization did get a healthy discussion in a 2005 article about Kelo in The Economist.[1] Still, I'd think the best course of action would be a redirect to Ardmore, Pennsylvania#Eminent domain controversy, which already has more information about the issue than does this spinoff POV stub (so no merge really needed).--Arxiloxos (talk) 05:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Ardmore, Pennsylvania#Eminent domain controversy as above. More complete description and more NPOV. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 21:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.