Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savaari (company)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Savaari (company)[edit]

Savaari (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A company that doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH; the existing references are funding announcements/press releases.This article was suggested as more substantive coverage on the talk page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Promising company but doesn't meet WP:ORG. There are many references but nothing that would meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The references offered by creator are routine announcements. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The company has been in existence since the last 12 years. It has coverage in print but online references are few Coverage prints. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RajkGuj (talkcontribs) Note to closing admin: RajkGuj (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
    • Comment Press releases are not independent sources and are not considered for establishing notability. HighKing++ 16:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  15:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.