Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saudia Mills

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Subject doesn't meet any criteria of WP:GNG. There are no reliable, secondary sources provided to prove notability. @pple complain 22:53, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saudia Mills[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real claim to notability. Eliminated reality show contestant, albums not on important label, no evidence of multiple significant roles in notable productions, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. PROD contested by article creator. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two of her three film roles are as a background character, and the only sources are a personal website and a label's. It sure looks like this article fails WP:GNG. —C.Fred (talk) 23:43, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MSJapan (talk) 00:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as created noted already, no consistent rules for reality show star Reality Show Contestants - see (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_%28music%29/Archive_4#Notability_of_.22reality_television.22_contestants.3F) - page stats traffic denote enough interest despite subjectivity on wiki notability. Also search of artist name yield enough articles from second hand sources. Article needs to be better developed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintersbrock (talk • contribs) 19:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC) — Wintersbrock (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note to closing admin: Above user is a meatpuppet of this article's creator per SPI. MSJapan (talk) 04:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As I wrote in my prod, there is no notability here. Coverage may exist in second hand sources but they are not independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Jap allegations don't equal truth. This account was created to protect myself from you and your crew of bullies. The pattern is clear and something will be done about it if you don't cease. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintersbrock (talk • contribs) 16:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC) — Wintersbrock (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.