Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 18:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Satux[edit]
- Satux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A Linux distro of unclear notability. Article lacks sources. Ham Pastrami (talk) 01:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment another of the several dozen such nominations. Another ed. removed the prods on them. Lack of notability is a reason to delete, not unclear notability. Unsourcable is a reason to delete, not unsourced. I would have a good deal more confidence in these nominations if the nom had reported an effort to at least try to source before bringing them here--a statement that no sources existed as judged by some search would help things along. Consider this comment copied on all the other mass noms. DGG (talk) 04:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Per your request: the article lacks notability based on the lack of reliable sources provided and the lack of reliable sources found. The article appears to be unsourcable based on a cursory examination of hits returned by googling. This is assumed to be the case for every other good faith nomination that is brought to AfD on similar grounds, but you're questioning these nominations merely because you object to the quantity. Consider this comment copied on all the other discretely selected noms. Ham Pastrami (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 03:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lack of notability and seems like advertising to me. Wikieditor06 (talk) 17:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.