Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satish Ganjoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Satish Ganjoo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable academic. WP:BEFORE shows that primary sources exist but no reviews or independent analysis found. Google Scholar shows that papers have been cited very few times. Single-purpose account made large number of edits with possibility of WP:COI Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could not find any viable sources. Balle010 (talk) 15:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't seem to satisfy any of the notability guidelines.Less Unless (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above Spiderone 09:41, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't pass WP:NPROF -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:26, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.