Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satan Disciples (gang)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 02:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Satan Disciples (gang)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's enough online for this to pass A7, but I can't find enough to support this gang's notability. Specifically, it is not included in the National Gang Threat Assessment 2009. I should note that I have found a number of lawyers' blogs and other documents to support the existence of this gang - but they are not reliable sources. Singularity42 (talk) 02:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - I endorse this deletion. The article does not meet wikipedia's guidelines for notability. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 03:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP -It meets wikipedia's guidelines for notability and it clearly cites sources. The stan Disciples are crearly notable group gang-activity-injunction-gang-members — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChicityJOE (talk • contribs) 19:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC) — ChicityJOE (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - "stan"??? "crearly"??? It seems that the only reason that this article was created is to help recruit gang membership. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.209.198.223 (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.