Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskatoon Wanuskewin NDP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saskatoon Wanuskewin NDP[edit]

A Riding Association isn't inheritently notable. Doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion. Delete GreenJoe 03:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - elections results are already included in the riding article -- repetition here is not needed. Ground Zero | t 03:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - most of it would fail due to being redundant against Saskatoon-Wanuskewin (the tables and much of the info has been copied from there). If the association is notable (considering it has not got any MPs elected, I doubt it), it could go as a single paragraph within the S-W article. Orderinchaos78 03:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; unnecessary duplication of more appropriate articles. Bearcat 03:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 08:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Individual constituency associations are not notable - any information relevant or notable can be put in the article on the constituency/riding. Sam Blacketer 14:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant and the riding association itself is not notable.-- danntm ^T _C 19:53, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNN only 20 ghits, also seems like information fails WP:V. Davidpdx 11:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.