Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Gabor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jujutacular (talk) 03:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sasha Gabor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable porn actor. Quis separabit? 19:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In addition to the citations in the article, seems to be notable in Norway.[1][2][3][4][5] Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I originally closed as Keep but someone was writing there !vote whilst I closed so I've reopened it. –Davey2010^Talk 01:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly fails PORNBIO. The coverage cited by MT falls well below what is required to meet the GNG, amounting to 1) a brief obituary; 2)a brief mention (with no biographical information) in an article about pprn performers ripping off actual celebrity names (Gabor acted as "Turd Wrenolds"); 3)a news-of-the weird type item that boils down to "porn star comes to town, wants local girls to have sex with him on camera", saying next to nothing about Gabor himself; 4) a brief description of a video (now offline) of someone named Alex Rosen telling a story about Gabor, labelled "humor"; and 5) a very brief followup to item 3, reporting that Gabor can only find one local girl willing to have on-camera sex. My comments here are probably longer than the collected biographical content about Gabor in the five articles combined. That's really not enough to sustain a biographical article for a subject who fails the relevant SNGs. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (changed from Delete) fails PORNBIO and there's no other claim of notability in the article, the refs shown here are of the "tabloid journalism" variety, discouraged to be used by WP:SENSATION. Having an obit in a newspaper is not enough, Wikipedia is WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Kraxler (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He most certainly fails PORNBIO, and I still think that most sources are tabloid journalism and a lot of obits which all repeat the same story. However, he may have been a minor celebrity in Norway, based on his looking like Sean Connery. There's reasonable doubt here as to whether he fails WP:GNG. Kraxler (talk) 16:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. Passes GNG with wide margin, I see dozens if not hundreds of articles in all the major Norwegian newspapers and publications. Some examples: [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Gabor was also the subject of an NRK1 (Norway's largest and oldest TV channel) documentary ([21], [22]). More coverage easily available, clearly a celebrity in Norway. Cavarrone 19:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm in the delete camp on about 97% of the debates about pieces on porn actors brought to AfD. However, Cavarrone has demonstrated that this deceased individual, as "Norway's most famous porn actor," has been the object of multiple instances of substantial coverage in independent publications of presumed reliability — and thus passes GNG, completely setting aside our ludicrous SNG for porn stars.. Carrite (talk) 15:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.