Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarsagun Patrika

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sarsagun Patrika[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this newspaper meets either WP:GNG or WP:NPERIODICAL. GSS ^💬 17:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and India. GSS ^💬 17:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, tried a WP:BEFORE search yesterday in English and Bengali, and couldn't find any mention of it in reliable sources. The Rising Voices reference was one of several I removed yesterday that don't mention the subject; most of the original article was copied nearly verbatim (and without attribution) from Fagun, an article about an unrelated Santali-language paper. It seems unlikely to me that the news portal linked has any relation to the print newspaper mentioned in the Pothi.com reference: it appears to be simply yet another Bengali-language churnalism portal, which doesn't mention, let alone suggest subscribing to, the printed paper that this article is ostensibly about. Wikishovel (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sarsagun Patrika is a popular newspaper of a Santali community in West Bengal. Everyone knows what Sarsagun magazine is? It is not so popular in all of India, but recently it is popular in West Bengal. I think this is a bit of a magazine, so Eligible I think. Faltu Katha (talk) 02:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

opposed undelete this article because this newspaper is best work for Santali Community. How to development their community cover this topic and conscious to Santal People's. Faltu Katha (talk) 02:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the deletion template from the article, that's disruptive editing and can lead to a block here. Oaktree b (talk) 02:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: AfD template has been removed twice now (I just reverted it) Please stop removing it. I don't see coverage at all for this publication, the source given seems to be all there is. Not meeting notability guidelines here. Oaktree b (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
opposed Faltu Katha (talk) 03:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you provide some evidence of extensive coverage in reliable sources? Simply opposing the vote doesn't advance the discussion. Oaktree b (talk) 13:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep Sarsagun Patrika is Santali newspaper in West Bengal. It is ingenious tribe media portal. Faltu Katha (talk) 15:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Faltu Katha (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]
Speedy delete: i searched a lot found nothing, even one article about this newspaper. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there's the one reference already cited from pothi.com, but it's still unclear what that newspaper has to do with the Bengali language website. For anyone hunting for references, the website transliterates it as Sar Sagun Patrika, but their Facebook uses Sarsagun Patrika. Wikishovel (talk) 16:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep this is notably I found in wrs Wikilovery (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC)— Wikilovery (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment article creator User:Faltu Katha (see ballot stuffing and sockpuppetry above) has been indefinitely blocked for undisclosed paid editing. Wikishovel (talk) 15:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.