Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarit2d (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The parenthetical disambiguation makes it a less likely search title, but if still desired it can be recreated as a redirect. ansh 666 04:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sarit2d (software)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFTWARE, no sources referenced or easily found through Google searches. <RetroCraft314 talk/> 18:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are not many link to sarit2d because sarit2d is temporally publied on a second level address: sarit2d.altervista.org, so Google doesn't consider it. However the product is good, useful and freeware, so all can use it. The author of sarit2d will improve the google results. Sorry for my bad english. And thank for collaboration.User_talk:Cosimopatrucci

—Preceding undated comment added 19:25, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

The discovery of the site where Sarit2D is published has nothing to do with finding reliable sources. The rules for including an article about a piece of software (WP:NSOFTWARE) and the general guidelines (WP:GNG) state that software must have coverage by significant, independent sources. Even the existence of reviews can qualify for WP:NSOFTWARE, but there are no independent sources at all that I can find. <RetroCraft314 talk/> 19:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks.User_talk:Cosimopatrucci

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 02:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My searches are finding nothing to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of interactive geometry software, where it's mentioned. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.