Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sari Gama Gama Gama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a soft delete, and the article may be restored by a request to WP:REFUND. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 13:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sari Gama Gama Gama[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No credible assertion signifying the notability of the article. No appropriate refs. Only one and that too to you tube (not allowed). Thus proposing its deletion under criteria A7. Might have nominated it for speedy deletion if it's category (television-related articles) was listed in A7. Also, the article seems to be a borderline advertisement, and is clearly not written neutrally. Also it can be clearly seen that the article contains (in fact its based upon) original research. King Of The Wise (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable notable notable. No media coverage. — Wylie pedia 16:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, I would be extremely careful with articles like this, as it is likely that sources exist in the Tamil language, which obviously most of us here can't read. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.