Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sargam Koushal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sargam Koushal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable due to WP:BLP1E and note that the other winners of Mrs. World do not have their own page, so precedent shows that there is no basis for creating a Wikipedia page just for women winning one low-profile marital pageant and doing nothing else with their reign. Fixthetyp0 (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I also wish to nominate the photo on Wikimedia Commons for deletion because I doubt this person who created a new account just to post this photo was truly submitting his "own work" (I suppose admin will have to look behind the scenes to see if this claim was convincing) but I do not know how to nominate photos for deletion. Fixthetyp0 (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Beauty pageants, and Jammu and Kashmir. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This article receives significant coverage according to the Wikipedia guideline on significant coverage per WP:SIGCOV. It also includes citations for different events like she was judge in Mrs South Africa 2023 (a national event), so it doesn't fall under the guideline for bio notable for single event per WP:BLP1E. However, the nominator claims that past winners lack Wikipedia articles. While some winners might not have articles, the presence or absence of articles for past winners is not a validity criterion for this specific article. Every article is evaluated on its own merits based on whether it meets the notability guidelines per WP:GNG and having WP: SIGCOV. Regards GAGIWOR (talk) 07:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a case of WP:BLP1E and so is notable. There are SIGCOV and bearing the title for "Miss world" is heavy that it can be a stand-alone entry for Wikipedia! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BLP1E is generally an argument against notability, not for it. Allan Nonymous (talk) 21:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.