Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Veitch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Veitch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Epbr123 (talk) 10:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no assertion of notability; no relevant GNews hits; others with same name appear more notable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Look at the article history. No edits in years, no substantial edits since creation, and the creator (Palmprint, the name of her publisher) had only one edit ever. It could likely've been prodded. There is one hit in the book The Headpress Guide to the Counter Culture but in preview I can see little more than "should be known to most Nexus readers" and "a regular in magazines like Kane, Forum and Desire." Also a hit in The Mammoth Book of Best New Erotica which calls her the "queen of corporal punishment writing." Шизомби (Sz) (talk) 04:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A clear case of CPBS — Corporal Punishment Book Selling. Carrite (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I found a over a thousand sources, but not a single one of them is reliable and independent. WP:BLP requires good sourcing. Bearian (talk) 00:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.