Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Schneider
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to CollegeHumor. MBisanz talk 00:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sarah Schneider[edit]
- Sarah Schneider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prod contested without rationale. Only assertion of notability is coauthorship on a non-notable book as part of a notable company. No sources discuss her individually. It would be fair enough to redirect the page to CollegeHumor if the same were done for more prominent individuals at CollegeHumor such as Jake Hurwitz, Amir Blumenfeld and Streeter Seidell Bigbluefish (talk) 09:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral. I feel she has sufficient notability to deserve a discussion rather than being deleted via the proposed deletion process, but not sufficient for me to take a stand that she definitely deserves an article. Powers T 15:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —94.196.163.252 (talk) 11:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —94.196.163.252 (talk) 11:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and merge verifiable and relevant parts to CollegeHumor. That way the TV series is also covered since those articles interlink clearly. I'd be happy to support redirecting the others even if there are no articles for them anymore since their name is a reasonable search term. - Mgm|(talk) 12:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.