Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Roberts (accountant)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Roberts (accountant)[edit]

Sarah Roberts (accountant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being the victim of a particular disease does not meet the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability (people). This information is more appropriate for inclusion in the article for the disease itself, Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. — TAnthonyTalk 14:41, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - An unfortunate individual who contracted this disease, but does not meet WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. We do not create pages for people whose only claim to notoriety is having died of a disease regardless of how rare or notable the disease is. Dom from Paris (talk) 01:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete dieing of this disease does not make someone notable. Wikipedia really needs to make article creation harder.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • If dying of this disease leads to coverage in three national newspapers, it does seem to be pretty notable. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.