Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kutulakos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Kutulakos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have attempted to locate significant independent reliable source coverage for her. All coverage I can turn up with searches such as this [1] show her being quoted, but not being a focus of the coverage. It seems her organization may be notable (but it already has its own article), but that she individually is not. And since notability is not inherited it seems too early to have a standalone article for her. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. jonkerz ♠talk 20:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Canada China Business Council. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find various instances of the subject being quoted in-role as company representative, but nothing that would indicate individual biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 05:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, even a redirect is not merited. Hairhorn (talk) 15:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article cites no non-WP:PRIMARYSOURCES, and no better reliable sources are easily located about her as a topic. If real sources actually start showing up I'm willing to revisit this, but in its current form it's a definite delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.