Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Khan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 23:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sarah Khan[edit]
Consider for deletion along with Miral sattar. It is a similar self-promoting article, and a look at the usernames of the articles' creators suggests that these two people have written each other's articles--some kind of vanity exchange? Hynca-Hooley 21:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as obvious vanity. She's a non-notable editor of a non-notable magazine. Aplomado - UTC 21:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or speedy, whatever. Thatcher131 21:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Gotham Magazine doesn't have an article so it raises the question as to whether its editor should have an article. In my view, the answer is no at this stage. Capitalistroadster 22:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable biography, WP:Vanity violation, as above. (aeropagitica) 23:52, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. —GrantNeufeld 04:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.