Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kerruish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 22:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Kerruish[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. The Peabody Award that this article claims for its subject appears to have been awarded to an entire film-making team that she was included in, which IMO falls short of ANYBIO territory. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Article is wtitten like promotion indicating only awards received WP:G11. Also poorly sourced. GargAvinash (talk) 19:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As a filmmaker, it is perfectly understandable awards are shared among directors, writers, etc. Peabody therefore clearly meets ANYBIO and, particularly, c. #3 of WP:CREATIVE is also met given the myriad reviews on her work I've found, including in the NYT, Variety, The Verge, etc. And these are just for a 2018 film. Yes, the article might be promotional, but that's easily fixed when so short. Best, PK650 (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Found enough sources to pass WP:GNG, and enough reviews to pass WP:CREATIVE#3 per PK650, especially around her 2018 documentary (but some earlier stuff). I wrote it as a paragraph. Couldn't verify everything in the list with reliable sources, but I think there's enough to keep the article. Have moved the original list to the talk page, so as not to have unverified info on there. Achaea (talk) 20:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Improve - needs more writing to fill in blanks between her achievements but she meets notability so this article should be kept. Jessamyn (talk) 00:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Does Meet WP:GNG as there is non-trivial coverage by multiple reliable sources. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.