Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Blake (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Blake[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously kept in 2007 but time and notability standards move on. Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet PORNBIO or GNG. Cowlibob (talk) 23:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above, Sadly fails PORNBIO .–Davey2010 • (talk) 00:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails PORNBIO with only scene-related award nominations. Fails GNG without substantial coverage by reliable sources. Searching for sources gets hits for other people with the same name. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom's and Gene93k's sound analyses. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concur with nominator analysis. Her scene-related award nominations does not satisfy PORNBIO. No evidence of coverage in reliable sources, let alone substantial coverage. Finnegas (talk) 21:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails PORNBIO and GNG.LM2000 (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails porn bio notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:47, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.