Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Woodhatch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Darkwind (talk) 21:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Woodhatch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the references don't mention the subject at all, those that do have her down as an assistant (in most cases to Hugh Grant, admittedly!). Also concerned over the fact this page has been variously created and edited by User:Sara Woodhatch, User:Richard dreu and User:Randall fines, created on 21, 24 and 25 March respectively. Contested prod by the latter. That aside, in summary, not sure about the notability, certainly not sure about the verifiability of it, and bothered by the proliferation of new accounts making a beeline for this new article. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Doubtful if notable yet. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 15:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the behavior of the users mentioned by the nominator is troubling. There seems to be the possibility of someone from IMDb trying to create an article about themselves. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:37, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since the subject co-produced Before Midnight (film), acquired by Sony Pictures, and since she's previously been credited as Post-Production Coordinator of Mickey Blue Eyes and Associate Producer of Did You Hear About The Morgans? (both of which are major motion pictures) I think she's notable enough for inclusion even if she did start out as Hugh Grant's assistant. You have to break into Hollywood somehow, after all. The problem as I see it is that it probably was written by the subject, as others suspect, so there are a lot of irrelevant sources regarding non-notable facets of her life, and not enough about notable facets. I therefore think it should just be rewritten by a neutral third party.HillbillyGoat (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Since when did an "associate producer" of a movie and a "post-production co-ordinator" meet the notability guidelines? The Rambling Man (talk) 06:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Being the co-producer of a movie is not inherently notable. -- Whpq (talk) 19:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.