Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Powell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article currently does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 09:16, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Powell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not comply with WP:NACTOR . Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Much more is needed to support notability as an actor.--Rpclod (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:DIDEROT Jim-Siduri (talk) 04:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 06:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Actors like this can become very notable over night so why make someone go through the work of having to rewrite it? I'm sure we can find lots of white male actors with far less impressive resumes and maybe one more ref who are kept without question. Let's not practice systemic bias here, please. Keep the tag on. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 16:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, if and ONLY if, it's expanded, as it stands now its barely a stub. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) 17:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Carolmooredc - Carol, what are you saying? "White", "male"... Why do you think I proposed the article for deletion? Do you know me? Regards. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 19:00, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning a factoid about bias, is not to say that a person is consciously biased vs. women or Africans. Their only bias may be that they hate bios without 15 solid WP:RS. However, in the overall scheme of the project, it tends to reinforce a systemic bias to remove articles about minorities and women when generally articles about white males will not receive as much scrutiny. Systemic bias is not necessarily a personal charge against a particular editor, unless one fully investigates their AfD history and finds it, which I'm not interested in doing. (Though I'm not against someone doing an across the board study of such a thing, and the Wikimedia Foundation has been funding all sorts of projects like that.) Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 19:07, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:GNG is gender blind, and the only possible usable source was this one which I'm not even sure is reliable. Carolmooredc is arguing that she -could- become notable in the future, which is not a valid argument. We're talking about now, not later. In the future, if more reliable sources take notice of her, this article will be recreated. Tutelary (talk) 19:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete How can one know if this article contains libelous information when there are no refs other than a movie database? Gandydancer (talk) 20:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. These are big TV shows within the UK and major theatres, even if they are small parts, if she fails to live up to the promise she has shown so far (by not going on to bigger parts) then the question could be asked again. At the moment she is a rising star. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 20:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If she is a rising star, then where are the reliable sources for her to meet the general notability guideline? Tutelary (talk) 01:51, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I'm afraid - I couldn't find any indepth reliable sources about the actress. Not 15, mind, any. The best was this list of roles, and a reference to IMDB. Should she become notable overnight, yes, we will restore or rewrite it. We have the technology. --GRuban (talk) 20:34, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no there there. SPECIFICO talk 02:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.