Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Juli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947 18:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Juli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria. Tumblehome (talk) 01:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. (t) Josve05a (c) 06:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. (t) Josve05a (c) 06:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. (t) Josve05a (c) 06:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep under WP:GNG, supported by the following sources:

Mainstream sources:

Groves, Nancy (12 November 2010). "Money talks: Artist Sara Juli discusses cold, hard cash in new show". The Independent. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
"A Truly Generous Performance". The New York Times. 12 February 2006. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
Hoffman, Barbara (13 February 2006). "SHE'S IN THE MONEY – PERFORMANCE ARTIST HOPES CASH REGISTERS WITH AUDIENCE". New York Post. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
"Take It, It's For You". The Story. 22 August 2013. Retrieved 11 March 2017.

Sources from important publications in the American modern dance scene:

Zimmer, Elizabeth (20 October 2016). "Sara Juli: Tense Vagina". Village Voice. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
"Sara Juli". The New Yorker. 14 October 2016. Retrieved 11 March 2017.,"Dance". The New Yorker. 27 October 2008. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
"The Money Conversation: Sara Juli in conversation with Juliana May". Movement Research. 16 May 2016. Retrieved 11 March 2017.

Local/regional sources:

Lockhart, Jessica (26 October 2015). "Dance review: 'Tense Vagina: An Actual Diagnosis' is an actually hysterical performance". Press Herald. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
Broili, Susan; Herald-Sun, Special to The (23 June 2016). "REVIEW: Juli tackles taboo subjects at ADF". The Herald-Sun. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
Howe, Brian (22 June 2016). "Sara Juli Talks About What We Don't Talk About When We Talk About Vaginas". Indy Week. Retrieved 11 March 2017., Woods, Byron (24 June 2016). "Dance Review: Sara Juli Will Tickle You at Motorco. No, Actually Tickle You". Indy Week. Retrieved 11 March 2017.</ref>
"Sara Julis The Money Conversation". Australian Stage Online. 2 October 2007. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
Wesley, Flora Wellesley (18 November 2010). "Sara Juli: The Money Conversation". Retrieved 11 March 2017.
Billings, Randy (7 March 2017). "Interpretive dancer pretends to vomit, among other things, at Portland council meeting". Press Herald. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
Interview on Maine's Coast 93.1

FourViolas (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes CREATIVE with reviews of work in major publications. For those who like WP:HEY, I added some of the sources that FourViolas found to the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep with reviews in the New York, NYT, Village Voice. --Theredproject (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly passes WP:CREATIVE as per above editors. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.