Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Jacobs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 08:43, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Jacobs[edit]

Sara Jacobs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, opponent of Mike Levin, no indication that she's more notable Elassint Hi 05:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 07:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 07:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 07:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable just by being a candidate. Acnetj (talk) 09:41, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they haven't won yet — and people doubly do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in primaries which they haven't even won to become general election candidates yet. If you cannot demonstrate and reliably source that she was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article for some other reason prior to being a candidate, then she has to win the general election in November to become notable as a politician. Bearcat (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Sources are routine coverage of her political campaign. ErieSwiftByrd (talk) 02:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Bearcat....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.