Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Azari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:55, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Azari[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lawyer and media personality of questionable notability. The article is promotional in tone, and was created by somebody who by their edits is likely an undeclared paid editor. The cited sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG - mostly appearances by Azari in media, or promotional interviews or profiles, or the likes of Youtube and IMDB. Sandstein 22:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 22:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 22:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 22:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability indeed looks very questionable. The reliable sources currently present appear all to be instances in which she was interviewed as a legal expert about something else, but they have no biographical element, so they don't count as sigcov. I haven't done a full WP:BEFORE so I won't !vote yet, but the article as currently written has not yet demonstrated notability. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 22:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — non notable lawyer who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 23:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A search for sources found nothing significant. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough notable per WP:GNG. Gold ★ ⁷⁸⁶ 13:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.