Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sapientech
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. GlassCobra 16:11, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sapientech[edit]
- Sapientech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Reads like an ad, no sources, doesn't seem notable to me. Speedy tag removed by author without reason. Cliff smith talk 16:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Author Kstandiford (talk · contribs · count) appears to have a COI. Cliff smith talk 16:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-It's just plain old spam. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a lineReview Me! 16:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Same user just made Kevin standiford, likely autobiography. Cliff smith talk 16:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable, does seem like an ad. Basement12 (T.C) 17:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that author has requested deletion of Kevin standiford. Cliff smith talk 18:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article about a company that makes no attempt to assert importance or notability. ~ Ningauble (talk) 19:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.