Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santosh Sahu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is clear her that the relevant notability guidelines are met. While I understand nom's objections, there is a clear consensus here to keep. (non-admin closure) Smartyllama (talk) 15:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santosh Sahu[edit]

Santosh Sahu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, nothing significant in searches, fails WP:GNG. –dlthewave 16:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave 16:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave 16:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave 16:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Played 53 matches in his career. There's this and lots of other match related coverage of his career which makes me believe there will be more in Indian sources and offline also. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Per Rugbyfan22. The nominator needs to realise that nominating cricketers with this many appearances is unreasonable and will get people's backs up. We're not talking about one or two matches here, but a fairly significant number for which coverage of some sort will exist, be it online or offline in Hindi language resources. StickyWicket (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - it is reasonable to expect coverage because cricketers with that many first-class matches usually pass WP:GNG. There is no urgency for expansion. Störm (talk) 07:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Played in more than 50 games in a career that spanned almost a decade. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep 53 qualifying games in a long career, including 2 FC tonnes. DevaCat1 (talk) 09:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per my comments at Dinkar Deshpande below. No Great Shaker (talk) 11:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to Closer: Please consider WP:NSPORTS, which is meant to help evaluate whether or not a subject is likely to have enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Playing a certain number of games does not establish notability, and only minor coverage has been found. –dlthewave 15:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - notable cricketer. Riteboke (talk) 08:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.