Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Santadas Kathiababa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG. Was draftified for improvement, but moved back into mainspace without improvement. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Philosophy, Hinduism, Bangladesh, and India. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The first source is a translation of his collected advice, so not independent. The second isn't about him, but about his teacher. Source Ei Samay is blocked. Whatever it says/said, a single source is not enough to establish notability. The remaining three sources are primary source images (which don't support the content where cited, by the way). Searches of the usual types, in English and Bengali, found no independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of him. Fails WP:BIO. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mccapra, Scope creep, and Vinegarymass911: Pinging as interested editors not already notified. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree that the sources provided do not demonstrate notability so based on them we should not keep this. There may be better sources in Bengali but I have not been able to find anything that looks useful. Mccapra (talk) 07:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poorly written and poorly sourced. Sources barely confirm his existence let alone establish notability.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be only one reference there and its a gallery. There is a shop ref. I couldn't find much in English sources on a WP:BEFORE but depending on how popular he is, there may be sources in other languages, although I would have assumed they would have already been added. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 09:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.