Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjib Sahoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjib Sahoo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography reads like a résumé~~, and might even be an autobiography or paid biography~~. It started its history as a cut-and-paste job from another website. I don't believe the subject meets the the notability standard for biographies of living persons. – voidxor 07:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... This is the editor of the biography. I am an amateur wiki editor who wrote this biography after meeting Sanjib at one of the conferences. It was partly to get familiar with wiki and partly because I was inspired by Sanjib and his transformational journey. Signed WikiContributorTH

@WikicontributorTH: I had previously asked your relationship to Mr. Sahoo on your talk page, and not gotten a response after waiting for over a year. So, thank you for explaining. Please note that this AfD is not a reflection on you as an editor, nor on Mr. Sahoo as a person. The issue I bring up is whether Mr. Sahoo meets the WP:BIO criteria for inclusion on this encyclopedia. Unfortunately, we cannot all have our own Wikipedia articles, not even everybody who has succeeded in the American Dream (as I realize Mr. Sahoo has). – voidxor 07:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 10:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 23:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 23:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No pass of WP:Prof. Material related to WP:GNG looks like churnalism and corporate blurb. WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as I concur it's clear advertising and I would've listed it for deletion in any chance I saw it given the blatancy here. The thinness of the awards simply show how there's simply nothing else. SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.