Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Sen (advocate)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, per G5. This article was created as a draft by the sock of a blocked spammer, accepted at AfC by another sock of the same spammer, then edited by a third sock - who looks like a different spammer. The only non-socky edit was to nominate it for deletion. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Sen (advocate)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No RESUMES please. RPSkokie (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. RPSkokie (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment we have 24 subcategories in the category:Lawyers, and >1,300 bios of US lawyers alone, all of which look pretty much like this - a career summary with sources supporting major cases they’ve argued. What is it about this one that the nominator feels is inconsistent with the others we host? Mccapra (talk) 08:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mccapra Not aware of others' but my nomination is based on plain vanilla observation. This article does not cite any sources that discuss the biographical particulars of the individual. RPSkokie (talk) 09:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.