Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Lindsay (nurse)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Lindsay (nurse)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Besides being the first person to get the COVID-19 vaccine, there is nothing notable about this individual. She had practically no coverage and was basically a nobody beforehand. Classic case of WP:ONEEVENT. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 March 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed per nom, that this is the case for WP:1E and didn't pass WP:GNG. Every country will have their first vaccinated person and I don't think those people are notable. SunDawn (talk) 05:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed for the reasons outlined above. She seems to be only notable for being the first person to get the vaccine in the US. Plus, looking at all the other COVID-19 vaccination country pages, no-other country has a page for the first person to be vaccinated in that country. Edl-irishboy (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly a case of WP:BIO1E. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She is the most extreme case of BLP1E I have ever seen. She is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO1E. Love of Corey (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. Super Ψ Dro 09:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:BLP1E applies in the same way it applied to the first person to get it in the UK, Margaret Keenan. Andysmith248 (talk) 20:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.