Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandor Bodzas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 09:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sandor Bodzas[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article doesn't meet WP criteria for notability BrantleyIzMe (talk) 05:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Insufficient cites on GS to pass WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 16:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (quip) 15:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Membership in a national academy is enough to pass WP:PROF. See [1] Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The claim that he is a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences is referenced in the article to a site in Hungarian, apparently of a judo school or similar. He only got a his PhD in 2014, & per the article is a junior lecturer. Too soon. I'm far from sure that WP:PROF means that every member of every national academy is notable; it's unclear. Actually he doesn't seem to be a regular member/fellow, but to be listed on some other "public body" database. As best as I can tell, these three are the only "Sandor" regular members/fellows (first names last in the usual Hungarian way). Johnbod (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not pass WP:PROF by high-impact publications (citation counts too low) nor by membership in the Hungarian national academy. If he were a full member he would certainly pass, and the reference does go to the academy's site, not to a Judo school, but it only shows that he belongs to some local committee, not that he has the kind of membership that would count as a high honor. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure any full member of any national academy would always pass - note that many countries have institutions like the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, and while academics may be covered by WP:PROF, there is nothing specific that I'm aware of in notability guidelines re writers and artists etc that make this a factor. Not really relevant here, since he isn't a member anyway. Johnbod (talk) 14:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PROF h-index is low.Further he passed his PHD only in 2014 and is only a lecturer.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.