Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Thakur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  14:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandeep Thakur[edit]

Sandeep Thakur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person seems to lack notability or the way the article is written and the references don't support the notability, with numbers of those references just being junk references. It seems that one author is trying hard to generate notability where none exists. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do not Delete The artist is genuine and is covered in various media and in the movie IMDb where his work has been clearly mentioned. By deleting it would mean that it was a fake account which isnt true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priya2017 (talkcontribs) 13:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do not Delete The artist is covered by various media you can verify. You can suggest edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.241.76 (talk) 07:47, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I could only find mere mentions about the subject, including in the links provided in the article itself. Appears it might be WP:TOOSOON for the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missvain (talkcontribs)
  • Delete Not seeing anything in the article or elsewhere that might amount to WP:SIGCOV. Edwardx (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.