Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanctuary (Nami Tamaki song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Speciality (album). I don't usually close AFDs I !vote in but there's absolutely no point dragging this on for the next entire week, Overall consensus is to redirect. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 03:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctuary (Nami Tamaki song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Richhoncho (talk) 23:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It was not in the article (so this is a good-faith nom), but the song charted for five weeks, reaching #12. I've added that to the article, with reference. TJRC (talk) 21:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Calathan (talk) 21:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Speciality (album). All the singles related to that one can be housed there where the album reached number one, and has a greater chance of getting background information on the single. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Speciality (album) per Angus - I'm not entirely sure whether charting on Oricon is all that notable ?, But either way considering it's a 2006 song it's had plenty of time to be improved so meh makes sense to redirect ,–Davey2010^Talk 01:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Speciality (album). Given the total absence of any third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage, the article fails the notability criteria outlined at WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. --DAJF (talk) 03:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.