Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanarus Technologies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 20:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sanarus Technologies[edit]

Sanarus Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP by a mile or so.Non-notable medical-service-provider. WBGconverse 16:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the two working refs are press releases. There is nothing independent and reliable here. The recent history of COI and copy vio editing probably hasn't helped, but there is nothing here, or in past versions of the article that get close to notability. Fails WP:GNG.  Velella  Velella Talk   17:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree and likely needs "salting" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not pass gng Wolfson5 (talk) 03:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not close to passing WP:GNG Adamtt9 (talk) 03:43, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Reference fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing++ 20:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.