Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanam Bloch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sanam Bloch[edit]
- Sanam Bloch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A "rising artist" with only a link to Facebook and no other references sourced, with none found. This is not a notable person. — Timneu22 · talk 13:19, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No English language evidence of notability. --Bhickey (talk) 13:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - After further searching, this person appears to fail not only WP:ARTIST, but also WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO. --Kudpung (talk) 13:33, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Notability in Pakistan might be notable enough for en.Wikipedia if someone could translate these Urdo sources and find if anything is in detail or depth about this individual. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article has no reliable sources that shows notability. I also searched her name on Google and found no reliable sources. --Hadger 23:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:49, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.