Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanabo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator has withdrawn the nomination. (non-admin closure) Dead Mary (talk) 12:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanabo[edit]

Sanabo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is too confusing to intelligently edit plus there no sources to provide guidance. Violates WP:PN. Rogermx (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It's a real village.[1] According to the Egyptian Central Bureau of Statistics in the Arabic article this has a population of over 30,000. Quite a significant population center and arguably a small city. The article being a mess is a case of WP:SOFIXIT, not deletion. I've reduced it to a cohesive stub. --Oakshade (talk) 03:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • As nominator for deleting this article, I agree with Oakshade's solution. Thank you Rogermx (talk) 14:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Its a clear keep per WP:GEOLAND which has been proven by user Oakshade. I will close this because the nominator has withdrawn the nomination and there is not much more discuss. Dead Mary (talk) 12:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.