Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Wong (pianist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Samuel Wong (pianist)[edit]
- Samuel Wong (pianist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to sufficiently assess notability. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. J04n(talk page) 01:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 01:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 01:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, there is a conductor with the same name, easy to confuse the two when searching. J04n(talk page) 01:16, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sounds like a solid artist and music teacher, but I just couldn't find reviews or other evidence of notability. The more I searched, the more impressed I became by the notability of the OTHER Samuel Wong, the conductor - but I just couldn't find anything about this one. --MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:V and WP:N. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.