Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel So

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR). King of ♥ 00:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel So[edit]

Samuel So (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable screenwriter. Apparently an autobiography. Article was AfD-tagged without followup by another editor--upon inspection, I decided to complete the nomination myself. A search for sources only revealed Wikipedia mirrors, IMDb-type sites, and passing mentions. Note: @Singlebird: For future AfD nominations, please fully follow the procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thanks. --Finngall talk 15:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm torn. On the one hand, the fact that Samuel So has produced so many notable films means that we'll create dozens of redlinks if we delete this article. But on the other hand, I literally cannot find enough coverage about him - as opposed to his many works - in reliable sources to build an article with a minimally acceptable amount of biographical detail. I don't know. In the meantime I've ensured that the Wikidata items of all his notable works link to the item about him, so that even if we delete this article that info won't be lost to future reusers. Deryck C. 20:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 16:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.