Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Kalimahana Miller
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. G7 - only substantial author requests deletion kelapstick(bainuu) 12:03, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Samuel Kalimahana Miller[edit]
- Samuel Kalimahana Miller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's a genealogical article. No evidence of encyclopedic notability. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is certainly a good call and have been contemplating merge with delete for the article, so I have requested G7 speedy deletion as the author of the only substantial content. Any admin seeing this should feel free to speedy.--Mark Miller (talk) 20:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your quick response. It sucks having an article deleted, and I appreciate your approach to this. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is certainly a good call and have been contemplating merge with delete for the article, so I have requested G7 speedy deletion as the author of the only substantial content. Any admin seeing this should feel free to speedy.--Mark Miller (talk) 20:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.