Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Jacob Klein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. If somebody wants to have this userfied, they can leave a note on my talk page. Randykitty (talk) 15:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Jacob Klein[edit]

Samuel Jacob Klein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BIO states

A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

I am not seeing significant coverage in independent secondary sources. The existing sources in the article are mostly internal lists, announcements, etc., which are neither independent nor secondary. I was able to find a 2007 Gamasutra article mentioning Klein's keynote speech at Game Developers Conference 2007, and an article from "Educationdive.com" which is used to cite the assertion that Klein was elected to the WMF board in 2009. Unfortunately, these additions do not bring the sourcing to a level needed to demonstrate notability, IMO. Eddymason (talk) 07:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or userfy per nom, as the sources in article now, as well as most of those I could find through Google, are primary. Fails WP:BIO. Jinkinson talk to me 01:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.