Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sampsonia Way

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sampsonia Way[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable online magazine fails WP:WEB. A google search or google news search returns a lot of hits, but the vast majority of the hits are for something else with the same name (i.e. a popular street in Pittsburgh, a popular art installation on that street, an organization which provides housing for persecuted foreign writers, etc.) Very few hits on the magazine itself. All of the sources that are currently in this article are either not reliable, trivial coverage, regurgitated press releases, or primary sources. No sources exist which establish notability per WP:GNG. Article created by single purpose account. SnottyWong ^express 17:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. bd2412 T 17:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 19:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's very little in the way of reliable sources to show notability, but a whole lot of fluff that reads like PR-speak. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.