Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samodzielny Pododdział Antyterrorystyczny Policji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 09:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samodzielny Pododdział Antyterrorystyczny Policji[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What makes this Polish police unit (or unit type, I think) notable? I see only mentions in passing. Seems to fail WP:NORG/WP:GNG. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What makes them notable? Perhaps this, and this. Keep. SpinningSpark 14:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The first source, from am online-only equivalanent of a trade journal, mentions the subject in a single paragraph. The second source is in-depth and reliable but also self-published by the subject (it is from a local branch of Polish police). I am afraid this still fails to show that the topic meets GNG/NORG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:55, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - The first source is discussing the history of police anti-terrorist units is it not? Just because it hasn't used the full title much (which is relatively recent) doesn't stop it being about the subject. The second source is from a regional police department, not the anti-terrorist unit itself (ie, not written by the subject), but I accept it is not independent. SpinningSpark 11:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I also offer this article, which admittedly doesn't have much, but it has some useable information discussing the plan to absorb these units into a new structure. SpinningSpark 12:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep Obviously a notable topic with enough sources for those who can use google, especially this one. Aslo pl-wp article exists, with other sources. I added "Expand Polish" template and interwikilink. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sourced article on police tactical units. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.