Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammy Kahn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sammy Kahn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was deleted in 2010 and restored, but still doesn't meet the notability guidelines for actors. The article's subject has not had any credits or coverage in more than 15 years. And the article has only one reliable source. Matuko (talk) 01:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Matuko (talk) 01:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero sourcing found, the one used in the article is good, but we need more than that. It appears this individual is no longer active, so we likely won't find any further sources. Oaktree b (talk) 04:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NACTOR. Minus the Sun Sentinel article I don't see any other mentions in the press, and neither a (dead link to a) cast bio nor an IMDB entry are useful for establishing notability. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 06:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of any significant coverage from reliable sources. Moresdi (talk) 09:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BASIC- hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources and only one reference is decent for basic information. Looked for sources but failed to find anything. Not notable because he has not received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. RealPharmer3 (talk) 14:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage. I сhecked the page in other languages. But they are even shorter. --Suitskvarts (talk) 10:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: This one is a shame. The source referenced above is a good, in-depth write-up, but the requirement that WP:SIGCOV comes from reliable sources, rather than a single source, is problematic here. Whether the subject meets WP:NACTOR or not is another question, but unless any other sources can be found—sources which, at the very least, mention him—I unfortunately don't think WP:GNG is made out. Dflaw4 (talk) 09:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.