Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sameer Bhat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sameer Bhat[edit]
Non-notable blogger/journalist, puff piece, only publications cited are in redlinked periodical. Delete. · rodii · 12:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I will add that the reason I brought this AfD is that User:Rerere12 (contribs) has added Sameer Bhat to Blog several times as if he were an especially notable blogger, which he is not. I suspect that User:Rerere12 is in fact Sameer Bhat or an associate, and so I looked into Bhat and found very little. I thought getting an assessment of notability (or non) via AfD might be indicated. · rodii · 22:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; notability not asserted in article. As always, there's five days to rectify this if it can be asserted. Colonel Tom 13:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, blogger who doesn't meet WP:BIO. All I can find is his blog and a couple of letters that may have been written by him to cnn.com. I can't verify the Periodical reference. If this is the criteria for inclusion my wikipedia article is overdue.--Isotope23 15:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. No notability at all. -- Kicking222 21:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A blogger that does not meet WP:BIO. — TheKMantalk 21:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.