Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sameena Mustafa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sameena Mustafa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a businessperson and comedian, not properly sourced as passing our notability standards for either endeavour. Her notability in business is limited to working for a local real estate company, and is referenced entirely to primary sources with no evidence whatsoever of reliable source coverage, while her notability as a comedian is limited to founding a local comedy night for people of colour, and is referenced mostly to primary sources too but for two glancing namechecks of her existence in newspaper articles that aren't about her. And for added bonus, somebody recently tried to rewrite the whole thing as an advertorialized and completely unsourced campaign brochure for her candidacy in a forthcoming congressional primary -- but that's not a reason why a person gets a Wikipedia article either; she has to win the election, not just run in it, to be considered notable as a politician. But for the reasons I've described above, she doesn't satisfy the notability standards for her current work either. Bearcat (talk) 21:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 22:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 22:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 22:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 22:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. This is a personal bio, and nothing meets WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPOL. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Available sourcing fails WP:BIO. Page appears to be PROMO created and expanded by a series of SPI accounts for a hopeful candidate; no claim to notability and sources just aren't out there.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.