Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Same-sex marriage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. MER-C 07:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex marriage[edit]

I am creating the discussion page on behalf of nominator Nkras. His given reason for placing the notice is "POV fork." DanB†DanD 07:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is a POV fork of Marriage. User Nkras was in a good faith negotiation to end the dispute in Talk:Marriage. See "In the wayback machine" onTalk:Marriage. User Coelacan marked Traditional Marriage for deletion as a fork to Marriage, currently under dispute and locked. If Traditional Marriage is a POV fork, so is Same-sex marriage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkras (talk • contribs)

Speedy keep: The topic and phrase are obviously notable enough for a separate article. I believe this nomination is frivolous and an example of WP:Point. DanB†DanD 07:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - Nomination was by a user in violation of WP:Point in retaliation as part of his content warring at Marriage. Threat of this action by said user is found here. AUTiger ʃ ^talk/_work 07:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per above. Justin Eiler 07:19, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep as nom being a WP:POINT violation. Note that user nominated the article in retaliation for the Traditional Marriage article (which he created) being put up for deletion. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 07:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.