Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sambasiva Reddy Aluru

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Srinivasa Ramanujan Institute of Technology. The consensus here is clearly in favor of merging anything salvageable to Srinivasa Ramanujan Institute of Technology. However, I would like to add a note that the latter article is also in dire need of some cleanup. Randykitty (talk) 17:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sambasiva Reddy Aluru[edit]

Sambasiva Reddy Aluru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:notability. No independent references in WP:reliable sources. His wife failing to get elected is not notable in itself and does nothing to establish his notability. Google searches only finding social media. noq (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I think there is no matter which is promoting, I removed all the matter which I feel as promoted.. please do reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.63.223 (talk) 05:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am not saying there is any spamming going on - but that there is nothing about him that makes his own encyclopaedia entry worthwhile. noq (talk) 10:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with the page for the institution of the man (SRIT). There is no separate notability for him. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - what do you feel is worth merging into that article? noq (talk) 10:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Noq Certainly his qualifications and career info. I leave it to whoever is merging to decide what is appropriate. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment He is a public figure, he is in politics, he is well known in his area, many people want to know his biography, wikipedia is nothing but for knowing biography or life., — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.63.223 (talk) 11:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - your sources?. who is wanting to know about him? I cannot find anything on google showing anything about him other than a page on the institution web site and a handful of social media sites. For someone in the public eye there is a lack of on-line coverage which seems strange. noq (talk) 12:55, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.