Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samara James

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Samara James[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:CORP requirement of having significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the topic. Instead, the references consist of: advertisements, a self-published opinion piece, company directories, association membership list, and numerous trivial mentions in non-relevant announcements and publications. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clear case of not meeting WP:CORP. Article reads like a publicity piece. AuthorAuthor (talk) 17:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- This seems to be a small manufacutring jeweller. Clearly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the references do not have significant coverage on the topic, and are mainly statements from the company. Nothing I saw looks like an independent source. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.