Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samah Safi Bayazid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. So Why 18:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samah Safi Bayazid[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doubtful notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:BIO. Edwardx (talk) 14:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Samah Safi Bayazid (sometimes: Samah Bayazid) and her husband, Muahammad, are well-known names in the Arab world. They also have profiles in IMDB. Some references to them in English resources http://hrp.law.harvard.edu/events/the-syrian-crisis-in-film-two-award-winning-short-narratives/ https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/21119 and http://www.masicna.com/samah-safi-bayazid.html --وسام زقوت (talk) 04:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as mentioned by user above, was profiled by TED and a speaker at TEDxTysons. Harvard screening film(s) is also a good start. I have added references linked above to the article in question. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 04:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep' Per above and a Gnews search. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.